TopBanner

“Me too” shouldn’t be confused with innovation

Google has rolled out BUZZ, their new social connection feature. It drafts onto Gmail, which I’ve been using to my content for a couple of years now. When Buzz rolled out I was asked nicely if I’d like to try it out – which was curious to me, because I’d clicked on my Gmail link in my browser. I was expecting my standard Gmail Inbox, not an offer. Going against my better judgment I thought “why not see if this new thing will be fun and make my life better?” I clicked OK.

By doing so, a new tab in the Gmail account list opened up beneath my Inbox called (appropriately) “Buzz”. Now I have yet another way to share with my friends my thoughts, links, aspirations, whether they want to read them or not. As comments came back, I noticed that my Inbox is now being flooded with responses to my various, non-sequitor test posts. Up until now, I had pretty good control over what came into this secret Inbox – and now it’s been contaminated. Before you hammer on me for not seeking out preferences or other settings to restore control to my Gmail Inbox, remember I accepted the offer to try this out. I’m sure that with a minimal amount of tweaking, it will begin to work the way I’d like it.

But the question that bothers me now is “do I really need another way to do this?”. Basically it amounts to a play against Twitter, which already serves as good of a role as needed in realm of sharing arguably pointless information. In the last years Twitter has even shown that it can be somewhat useful, and has a wide enough API to be easily integrated in multiple platforms. Does Google really need to BUZZ? I’m not convinced that this a good move. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong in the coming months or years, but I don’t know of many people who’ve jumped on the WAVE bandwagon.

This smacks of Microsoft’s failed attempt to get into the blog world with Spaces, and Facebook’s current User Experience disaster (created when they tried to angle their News feed to be more like Twitter). I understand that there’s a business need to compete with people in your space, but merely copying what they do is short-sighted. Be unique!

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter
line

In great anticipation

I’ve wanted a great tablet form factor for years, so today I’m particularly curious to see what is to be revealed by Apple. I’m not expecting anything beyond the current rumors (and if there is something truly awe inspiring that the blogosphere has not heard of as yet, then more joy for us). My fascination goes back to the point where I first starting hearing about Microsoft’s efforts with the tablet.

At that time, Microsoft already had the MS Reader application, available for PDAs and other devices. When news of a TabletPC broke internally, it seemed to be a perfect match. Even though portable hardware systems would knowingly have power, storage, and connectivity issues (at least wireless networking was strong enough to make them usable), this was an exciting concept. My biggest excitement, however, was for a better stylus-screen drawing surface. With great anticipation I reached out to one of the Program Managers on the TabletPC team. His name escapes me, unfortunately, and I would probably not be inclined to repeat it even if I’d remembered who it was.

To my great surprise, my ideas of the TabletPC being an e-Reader and drawing platform were off their radar scopes. “This is to be a business machine, there’s no money out there for such consumer gadgets”. In their mind, the TabletPC form factor was to be only a digital version of a legal notepad. They had focused heavily on handwriting recognition (needed), but had no inclination to radically improve the UI – to adapt it for the new form factor. Most of them would be sold as a laptop with a rotating screen (yes there was the slate form factor as well). This is why, years later, you could never tell if someone actually had a TabletPC – users kept their screens flipped up like a laptop, typing on the keyboard and never using the pen input.

And while Wacom was tapped to provide the screen techology, nobody from Microsoft seemed to want to capitalize on their fantastic drawing technology. Why waste time targetting a design market when your sole focus is on the business executive? Wacom, the undisputed champions of stylus-screen technology, were asked to provide a more rudimentary interface (read as “cheaer”), one that didn’t allow for drawing sensitivity. Even my ten year old Wacom ArtIIz provided better resolution and actually had pressure sensitivity. I’m not sure at this time, if this kind of functionality will be on the new Apple tablet, but Microsoft was soooo close to a sweet spot here. There are those who have had a great time drawing this this device – and even I’ve done so on many occasions. It’s easier to draw with than, say, an Etch-a-Sketch, but not enough to make me want to do it with any regularlity.

Today, Apple is going to reveal a tablet device that capitalizes on a consumer audience. An audience that has the advantage of being previously shown how a quality consumer device can find its way into the business market (iPhone). My guess is that this new tablet, while not revolutionary in technology, will be one that pulls together many disparate personal experiences into a great form factor. And as Microsoft’s TabletPC slides further back into the history books, we’ll be wondering if a few years why this form factor wasn’t around a lot sooner. It was, but the product line was not properly targetted – nor was it corrected after many iterations. This was Microsoft’s market to lose, and while there is some fascinating thinking coming out of Redmond with touch-screens and surfaces, it’ll be up to them to decide if they can clear their heads aim at the right target for a change.

UPDATE POST-CONFERENCE: Dang, no stylus!

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter
line

Robots in the house

A lot of work is being done here in the U.S. and overseas to create robots in the form of humans. While most of these efforts have remained demonstration-only, some have been created purely for prurient applications. There are many barriers to creating a perfect, human-looking and human-acting device. Barriers that will likely keep engineers and technicians tinkering away for decades before the perfect device sees the light of day.

I’ve wondered recently why we don’t see more effort being leveled at creating, and marking household robots that serve a variety of functions, yet do not specifically look like a human being. Is there really a need to wait until an absolute facsimile is possible (or affordable)? There are plenty of cinematic robots that have enough personality embued to them without appearing specifically human:
Robby the Robot

The Lost in Space Robot

And an example where they threw out human forms altogether, yet managed to elicit an emotional response when one of the robots is hurt or destroyed:

Robots - Silent Running

I believe people would be accepting of non-human looking robots, if the benefit and cost were high enough to merit ownership. Take the iRobot company and their “Roomba” line.

Roomba a520

Some care should be taken to make sure these devices aren’t completely abhorrent to look at. I for one will be keeping an eye out for what iRobot comes up with in the coming years. Science Fiction nostalgia fans have even made this craftsman’s dream a reality – he is building and selling licensed B9 Robots from Lost in Space. I’d like to see someone take the notion of the household robot down these lines – bring a functional robot into the home for people who may need assistance with day to day chores. There is a market opportunity here that is being missed for the sake of human narcissism.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter
line

What’s new for 2010

For all of those joining in, welcome to 2010. Several items have come up in the last few months worth mentioning. First, I have been welcomed to Razorfish, in their Seattle office. I am now a User Experience Lead there, as of October 20th, 2009. To say the least, this was a wonderful way to end the year. I’m finding the atmosphere there to be a vast improvement over what I left. Although I’ll be the first to admit that’s not giving it the proper credit, an abattoir would’ve been a vast improvement. I’m sure that after the honeymoon is over I’ll find elements that aren’t terribly pleasant, but from where I sit this organization is populated with talented people who seem to be driven to succeed, and realize that the success of any given project is based on how well a team operates. Cliche, perhaps, but it’s amazing how often individuals forget this simple foundation.

My personal video project has also been revived in recent weeks. I can only attribute my renewed interest to my recovery from last year’s disaster. That I managed to travel to several unique locations and capture over 12 hours of high definition video earlier in the year is a testament to a level of resolve that I’m only now beginning to rekindle. Originally I’d intended on having this project finished by the end of the summer, but life intervened. Now I am on track to have a trailer posted on BlackBirdCD.COM shortly.

And of course this site, my re-purposed “BlackBirdCD.Com” site. I have already begun moving over content from Rendezvous Design, including my work portfolio which you can view here. Rendezvous Design will revert to our Interior Design business, which my wife Stephanie is revisiting this year.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter
line

Why the name “BlackBirdCD”?

Years ago I was working on a retail website that was attempting to use the old Microsoft Passport service for user logins. Testing and verifying the site required that I sign up for a Passport account. I already had an email account through my ISP, and wasn’t terribly interested in using the Passport email address. But I needed to make one and wanted something I could remember.

At the time I was still driving the first car I ever purchased new, a 1997 Pontiac Firebird Formula. A black Firebird. It was the first thing that came to mind in choosing my Passport user name so I tried just “BlackBird”. This was taken, so I appended it with my initials, BlackBirdCD. And with that, I had my email nom de plume.

I never deactivated the account, but I did move ISPs several times. Each time I relied on my old BlackBirdCD email in passing, so the name sort of stuck with me. It’s really as simple as that.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter
line

Hello Everyone

I’m setting up this WordPress site.  Don’t mind the mess.  Soon it should look like the rest of my sites.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter
line